SitePages - CycleSurvey

1. Respondent Name *

Affiliation *

e-mail *

Membership - Check all that apply.

TEPPC

SPSG

TAS

TAS DWG

TAS HWG

TAS MWG

TAS SWG

EDTF

None

Stakeholder Type - Check all that apply.

Utility

Transmission Developer

State/Provincial

Governement

Federal Government

NGO

Consultant

Other

2. Please identify the three items that would be most useful for you to see in an Interconnection-wide 10-year transmission plan.

Congestion analyses

Alternative resource locations

Capital cost estimates for new generation

Operating impacts of transmission planning

Projected load and resource changes

Options for new transmission corridors

Capital cost estimates for new transmission

Policy options (e.g., resource relocation, EE/DSM, carbon reduction)

Institutional considerations (e.g., planning cooperation)

3. Please identify the three items that would be least useful for you or that you believe are inappropriate for a 10-year transmission plan.

Congestion analyses

Alternative resource locations

Environmental/cultural analyses

Capital cost estimates for new generation

Operational impacts of transmission planning

Projected load and resource changes

Options for new transmission corridors

Capital cost estimates for new transmission

Policy options (e.g., resource relocations, EE/DSM, carbon reduction)

Institutional considerations (e.g., planning cooperation)

4. Please identify the three items that would be most useful for you to see in an Interconnection-wide 20-year transmission plan.

Congestion analyses

Alternative resource locations

Capital cost estimates for new generation

Operating impacts of transmission planning

Projected load and resource changes

Options for new transmission corridors

Capital cost estimates for new transmission

Policy options (e.g., resource relocation, EE/DSM, carbon reduction)

Institutional considerations (e.g., planning cooperation)

5. Please identify the three items that would be least useful for you or that you believe are inappropriate for a 20-year transmission plan.

Congestion analyses

Alternative resource locations

Capital cost estimates for new generation

Operating impacts of transmission planning

Projected load and resource changes

Options for new transmission corridors

Capital cost estimates for new transmission

Policy options (e.g., resource relocation, EE/DSM, carbon reduction)

Institutional considerations (e.g., planning cooperation)

6. a. What additional information, if available, would be useful to your internal analyses and planning activities?

One response per line.

6. b.

One response per line.

6. c.

One response per line.

7. a. What types of decisions, if any will you use RTEP information and/or the 10- and 20-year plans to support?

One response per line.

7. b.

One response per line.

7. c.

One response per line.

8. a. What question(s) would you like the plans to answer? As an example, please see the draft WECC scenarios posted on the SPSG web site. On page 4 of the document, you will see two focus questions related to the future of WECC’s region.

One response per line.
To review the SPSG Scenarios, see the following URL:http://www.wecc.biz/committees/BOD/TEPPC/SPSG/EPS/WECC%20Scenarios%202011%20(Revised%2009-30-2011).pdf

8. b.

One response per line.

8. c.

One response per line.

9. a. At what point in the process of creating these plans would you like opportunities for review and comment? 10-Year Plan. Check all that apply.

Stakeholder Study Case Requests

Study Case Prioritization

Draft Study Program

Preliminary Study Case Results

Draft Plan

9. b. 20-Year Plan. Check all that apply.

Scenarios

Proxies

Inputs to SCDT

Possible Transmission Segments

Optimized Transmission

Plan and Policy Implications

10. How much time do you need to review and comment on a report this is approximately 100 pages, including both text and data/graphics?

1 week

2 weeks

3 weeks

4 weeks